
Agentic B2B sales
An agentic studio for complex B2B deals, €5M to €500M and above. It covers the full bid lifecycle through specialized agents working under explicit rules, with human validation at every gate and a structured deal memory. The same architecture transfers to other business functions.
Not a proposal generator. A studio that carries a deal from the first signal to the signature, and keeps what it learned.
Vodafone, March 2026: an agent produces an RFI/RFP draft ninety percent finished in minutes, against the ten to thirty days a telco response normally takes. It reads policies, past responses, the product catalogue and pricing, then hands over to the account manager. A proposal generator, and a good one. Six stages sit around it.
| Stage | What happens |
|---|---|
| Qualification | Score the opportunity across feasibility, desirability, winnability and viability. Produce a go or no-go that can be defended. |
| Solution | Win themes, solution architecture and delivery model, challenged against what the client actually decides on. |
| Price-to-win | Commercial model, competitive price position, margin trade-offs, negotiation playbook. |
| Storyline | The executive narrative and the orals, built from the client's decision criteria rather than from the solution. |
| Review gates | Opportunity, solution, proposal and contractual gates: materials, compliance checklist, decisions recorded. |
| Deal memory | Everything above stored as structured memory, so the next deal starts from what the last one learned. |
The same three convictions as everywhere else: the craft of the best bid people is the target, the whole cycle is in scope from day one, and the deal knowledge is what remains.
Fujitsu, March 2025: an orchestrator coordinating specialised agents made sales proposal creation 67% more productive. The agents retrieve and synthesise knowledge scattered across internal sources. The architecture holds at that scale. The case describes no validation step for what the agents produce. That step is the centre of this section.
The studio is not one assistant. It is a set of roles - qualification, content, planning, orchestration, pricing, challenge, analysis - each with a defined scope and each operating under written rules. Those rules are readable, arguable and versioned. Nothing runs on an implicit prompt.
The agents prepare, structure, challenge and produce. The decision stays human at every gate: qualification, solution, price, storyline, submission. This is not a safeguard bolted on afterwards; the review gates are the backbone of the design.
Bid knowledge is normally lost twice: when the team disbands, and when the next bid starts from a blank template. The studio keeps a structured memory of the deal - decisions, trade-offs, pricing logic, what convinced and what did not - so knowledge compounds from one deal to the next.
A dedicated role does nothing but attack the deal: assumptions, blind spots, the credibility of the delivery story, the price position. Being challenged early by a machine that has read everything is cheaper than being challenged late by the client.
Twenty-five years of large pursuits, and the same four causes. None of them is a weak solution.
The solution is almost never the cause. Deals are lost on a poor reading of where the real power sits.
Price is set too late, or without competitive discipline.
Execution degrades under pressure: the storyline and the client's perception go with it.
Without rigorous orchestration, the critical moments are left to chance.
Four diagrams: what the studio is for, what it can do, how it runs day to day, and which agents do the work.
Favor winning the deal over the theoretical optimum of the solution.
Ensure a credible post-signature delivery, risks identified and the solution under control.
Produce deliverables that hold up, for the client as much as for internal review.
Keep the deal steered end-to-end, including decisions, trade-offs and the investment.
Keep a continuous critical analysis of the strategy, the price, the solution and the influence map.
Read the opportunity, open the deal, set the artifacts up properly.
Suggest the next move rather than waiting to be asked.
Draft the deliverables, versioned, for humans to take further.
Keep the plan, the trade-offs and the risks under control, day to day.
Attack the deal continuously: assumptions, price, blind spots.
Synchronize humans, agents and tools; hold priorities and dependencies.
Build memory per deal, sector and client - wins and losses both.
Turn weak signals into structured opportunities and initialize clean artifacts.
Generate complete alpha and beta versions, and give the human contributors something to react to.
Challenge the strategy, the solution and the price. Reveal the blind spots.
Structure the memory per deal, learn from wins and losses, by sector and client.
Propose proactive actions, suggest the workshops, push for controlled risk-taking.
Steer the deal day by day and week by week, tracking trade-offs and risks.
Coordinate humans, agents and tools; manage priorities and dependencies.
Analyzes qualification and competitive position.
Develops pricing strategies and models.
Generates client-facing content.
Validates assumptions and plans for risks.
Every gate is theirs. The agents prepare; the team decides.
Develops strategies and solutions.
Manages timelines and task assignments.
Triggers and sets up new deals.
Each role has a defined scope and written, versioned rules. Nothing runs on an implicit prompt.
Nothing in the architecture is specific to selling. Specialized agents, explicit rules, human validation at defined gates, structured memory: the same structure fits any function where experts make consequential decisions over a long cycle.
Each new studio reuses the same foundation: agents, rules, validation, memory. What changes is the craft it learns.